Skip to main content
This is an image if office buildings reaching toward the sky

Hedging and COVID-19: 3 key considerations

June 25, 2020
  • amol dhargalkar headshot


    Amol Dhargalkar

    Managing Partner, Chairman
    Global Head of Corporates

    Kennett Square, PA


Corporations managing financial risk in today's volatile market should consider increasing their fixed-rate debt percentage, adopting enhanced hedge accounting approaches, and addressing rate-floor mismatches.

Key takeaways

  • As rates continue falling, consider increasing your organization's percentage of fixed-rate debt using either bond markets or swaps to synthetically convert floating rate debt.
  • In times of high forecast volatility, the Critical Terms Match (CTM) approach could exacerbate triggering a “missed forecast" and jeopardize your organization's ability to apply hedge accounting.
  • The value of the 0% floor has increased significantly from just a few months ago and, as a result, could cause a failure in hedge accounting if your organization has hedged term-loan debt without including the floor in your swap.

With a global pandemic impacting nearly every aspect of life, corporate treasury teams are challenged to react to markets reminiscent of the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009. Equity markets continue to fall despite monetary policy actions, and interest rates fell to near zero across the yield curve. Credit markets exhibit stress in various pockets, including commercial paper and high yield. Additionally, many companies’ underlying businesses have seen dramatic changes relative to forecasts made as recently as a few months ago. How can your company address its financial risk management program in light of these unprecedented times?

1. More fixed-rate debt

Companies have been increasing their fixed rate debt percentage, either naturally or synthetically, since early 2019 when the Fed took action to stem a potential recession. As rates continued falling, leading to inverted yield curves, companies continued to skew their debt towards fixed rate using either bond markets or swaps to synthetically convert floating-rate debt. Today, we see companies pursuing one of three strategies:

Locking in low rates

If your company has not hedged its floating rate debt: Locking in historically low swap rates for between three and five years at rates of roughly 0.5 – 0.6%. The current market environment essentially offers your company the chance to lock in longer-term zero-percent interest rates with limited opportunity cost. While Europe has taken short-term rates negative, Jerome Powell, Chair of the Federal Reserve, has repeatedly stated that the Fed does not believe this is an appropriate policy tool for the U.S. economy, instead focusing on asset purchases and greater liquidity for financial institutions.

Extending existing hedges

If your company has already hedged its floating rate debt: Many companies are considering extending existing hedges that may mature in the next few years while rates remain low. The cost of hedging forward exposure remains relatively low and, as a result, is highly attractive if your company is looking to manage its exposure. For example, a company looking to extend hedges that mature in mid-2021 can lock in three-year swap rates of 0.6% and effectively extend the life of its fixed-rate debt to mid-2024.

Increasing pre-issuance hedging

If your company anticipates issuing fixed-rate bonds: As rates have fallen and become more volatile, companies have increased their use of pre-issuance hedging as a tool to managing interest rate risk. Investment-grade companies primarily issue debt as a spread to Treasury yields, and companies with near-term (3-6 months) issuances planned have increasingly hedged this exposure using treasury locks. Companies are looking beyond this shorter window, though, and hedging 2021 and beyond issuances primarily using forward-starting swaps. A company looking to hedge an issuance in 2022, for example, can lock in a 10-year swap rate of 0.86%, which is only 10 basis points higher/lower than the current 10-year swap rate. The increased certainty of locking in low rates can provide meaningful flexibility when planning capital structure decisions.

2. Enhanced hedge accounting approaches

For years, the path of least resistance for companies starting foreign currency (FX) hedging programs has been to utilize a critical-terms match (CTM) approach to hedge designation for their programs. In essence, arguing that the exposures and hedges are aligned to the same period allowed companies to apply hedge accounting with lower investment in upfront and ongoing accounting analysis. When forecasts come to fruition and hedges are conservatively applied, CTM indeed offers an easier path to hedge accounting. In times of high forecast volatility, though, CTM could exacerbate triggering a “missed forecast.” If your company experienced multiple such missed forecasts, you could find your organization unable to apply any form of hedge accounting on your FX programs, therefore introducing more volatility to earnings.

An alternative that companies have long applied to CTM is the use of a “window” approach to exposures, along with a regression methodology. The exposure window allows your organization to use a single hedge (or portfolio of hedges) against a rolling three-month (as an example) window of exposures. If exposures don’t materialize in a particular month, the hedge can look to exposures from the following months depending upon the hedge designation documentation. This ultimately offers two benefits:

  • You can hedge more exposure without fear of missing a forecast.
  • You gain more flexibility in forecasting over longer periods, reducing the risk of missing a forecast itself.

In addition to the rolling three-month window, another long-haul approach, which increases the flexibility around timing of hedged transaction, is using a spot method designation. Similar to the three-month window, the spot method designation can allow for a wider exposure window, often beyond three months. With the adoption of ASU 2017-12, you can use the spot method designation and amortize the cost/benefit of the inception forward points. As such, timing differences will not impact hedge effectiveness testing, which is why flexibility in timing is achievable. The tradeoff for this increased timing flexibility is that the value of the excluded forward points needs to be recognized in earnings over the life of the trade, causing early recognition of derivative gains and losses.

3. Addressing rate-floor mismatches

When hedging U.S. dollar-based term-loan debt with swaps, you often had to decide whether to include the purchase of a floor (often at 0%) embedded into the swap. Most term loans include some type of LIBOR floor, and those triggered at 0% feel as though they have no value because expectations are low for the U.S. to take short-term rates negative even in the current environment. Buying the floor, though, does increase the swap rate and, thus, may feel like an unnecessary cost to ensure against an unlikely market event. For example, as recently as in January 2020, the difference between a five-year swap with and without a 0% LIBOR floor was about 5 bps. Consequently, many companies decided to not purchase the floor. While this caused some additional complexity for hedge accounting purposes, these transactions ultimately passed effectiveness testing and qualified for hedge accounting.

While rates are still positive, the Fed’s dramatic lowering of rates to zero has caused the entire yield curve to get closer to zero as well. Ultimately, this impact will be felt in the value of the 0% floor. It has increased significantly from just a few months ago and, as a result, could cause a failure in hedge accounting if your organization has hedged term-loan debt without including the floor in your swap. You can address this by first analyzing your hedge accounting approach to determine the likelihood of discontinuing hedge accounting. If your organization is considering hedging now, it may be economically prudent to purchase this floor along with any swap — the net rate is still much lower than it was only a few months ago, with protection against both the possibility of failed hedge accounting and failed hedge economics.

Managing financial risk in a volatile market

COVID-19 represents a significant opportunity and risk to financial risk management programs. Market movements created the chance to lock in longer-term fixed-rate debt synthetically. Hedging programs built for flexibility will continue to thrive, and those more rigidly structured have the chance to grow and provide even greater opportunity in the future. Chatham stands ready to guide your organization in navigating these and other changes. We look forward to supporting you and your teams through these challenging moments.

Chatham Financial corporate treasury advisory

Chatham Financial partners with corporate treasury teams to develop and execute financial risk management strategies that align with your organization’s objectives. Our full range of services includes risk management strategy development, risk quantification, exposure management (interest rate, currency and commodity), outsourced execution, technology solutions, and hedge accounting. We work with treasury teams to develop, evaluate and enhance their risk management programs and to articulate the costs and benefits of strategic decisions.

Ready to talk about your hedging strategy?

Complete the form below to speak with an advisor about your financial risk management strategy.

About the author

  • Amol Dhargalkar

    Managing Partner, Chairman
    Global Head of Corporates

    Kennett Square, PA

    Amol Dhargalkar is a Managing Partner and Chairman for Chatham’s Board of Directors. He is the Global Head of the Corporates sector and brings over 20 years of experience in derivatives capital markets expertise.


Chatham Hedging Advisors, LLC (CHA) is a subsidiary of Chatham Financial Corp. and provides hedge advisory, accounting and execution services related to swap transactions in the United States. CHA is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a commodity trading advisor and is a member of the National Futures Association (NFA); however, neither the CFTC nor the NFA have passed upon the merits of participating in any advisory services offered by CHA. For further information, please visit

Transactions in over-the-counter derivatives (or “swaps”) have significant risks, including, but not limited to, substantial risk of loss. You should consult your own business, legal, tax and accounting advisers with respect to proposed swap transaction and you should refrain from entering into any swap transaction unless you have fully understood the terms and risks of the transaction, including the extent of your potential risk of loss. This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or agent of Chatham Hedging Advisors and could be deemed a solicitation for entering into a derivatives transaction. This material is not a research report prepared by Chatham Hedging Advisors. If you are not an experienced user of the derivatives markets, capable of making independent trading decisions, then you should not rely solely on this communication in making trading decisions. All rights reserved.