Chatham's response to ISDA's consultation on pre-cessation fallback provisions
- April 8, 2020
Private Equity | Kennett Square, PA
SummaryChatham believes that pre-cessation fallback provisions will accommodate the needs of most market participants and should be included in ISDA's revised definitions and new protocol.
Chatham believes that pre-cessation fallback provisions should be included in the Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions and the related Protocol. Over the past several months, an increasing number of contracts referencing LIBOR include a pre-cessation fallback trigger, and the Alternative Reference Rates Committee has also recommended including a pre-cessation trigger in LIBOR fallback language in contracts for cash products. While we understand it is impossible for the Protocol to fit every market participant’s needs, Chatham believes that including pre-cessation fallback triggers will accommodate the needs of many market participants, which will allow for broader market adoption.
That said, Chatham supports ISDA’s efforts to publish templates for standard modifications to allow for market participants to bilaterally negotiate terms outside of the standard ISDA Definitions and related Protocol. Entities transacting with multiple counterparties will likely prefer the convenience and efficiency of a protocol, but Chatham expects many end users will instead prefer template language for bilateral incorporation. This may be operationally easier and potentially less costly for end users facing only one or a few counterparties and will also give end users the most flexibility to customize language to fit their particular needs.
Talk to a Chatham expert about LIBOR transition
Fill out the form below to speak with a Chatham representative about how the LIBOR transition affects your business.
Our featured insights
Term SOFR endorsed by the ARRC
The ARRC formally recommended the CME Group's Term SOFR to support the transition away from LIBOR and as the replacement rate for contracts that use the ARRC's recommended LIBOR replacement language.
U.S. federal legislation for LIBOR transition
The U.S. House Financial Services Committee, Ways and Means Committee, and Education and Labor Committee are considering legislation that would provide a framework to determine the replacement rate in contracts that reference LIBOR but do not include fallback language identifying a replacement...
FAQ: USD LIBOR transition to SOFR
USD markets started transitioning from LIBOR to SOFR in 2017 after the FCA announced that LIBOR was at risk of discontinuation at the end of 2021. Chatham’s experts answer the most pressing questions asked by our clients about how the transition will affect their port.
LIBOR transition update — Q2 2021 review
Chatham’s update on the LIBOR transition, summarizing recent news, transaction activity, and upcoming deadlines to help you stay current as the market transitions away from LIBOR.
SOFR: A comprehensive guide
How SOFR, the benchmark rate chosen by the ARRC to replace USD LIBOR, works and what drives its movements
USD LIBOR transition: credit-sensitive fallback rates
With more and more talk of various credit-sensitive alternatives to USD LIBOR, we’ve prepared an overview of some of the leading credit-sensitive alternative benchmarks (e.g., AMERIBOR, BSBY, et al.). We discuss what market events led to the current state, provide a comparison of the leading...
Axios interviewed Matt Hoffman about banks pulling away from LIBOR
Matt Hoffman explains to Axios why some banks may be planning their move away from LIBOR to another credit-sensitive rate by the end of this month.