Rate cap provider ratings and downgrade triggers
Global Head of Real Estate
SummaryInterest rate caps are purchased to hedge floating-rate loans every business day. Cap pricing is driven by economic factors including the notional hedged, term, strike rate, forward curve, and volatility of the underlying index.
Counterparty ratings requirements
For the same reason you want a financially sound provider of life insurance - so you can be confident the provider will pay when there is a claim - lenders and borrowers also want a financially sound rate cap provider. This most often manifests itself in credit rating requirements on cap providers. When a lender sets out the requirements of a cap, they often stipulate minimum counterparty ratings requirements. Counterparty ratings requirements can be broken down into two buckets:
- Minimum counterparty ratings— are they qualified to provide the cap initially?
- The downgrade triggers— at what ratings are they no longer qualified to provide the cap?
Minimum Counterparty Ratings are the lowest credit ratings that a potential cap provider can have in order to qualify as a potential cap provider at the time of purchase, and this is pretty clear-cut—either they qualify or they don’t.
Downgrade Triggers require a cap provider to maintain certain ratings, and if they fail to maintain those ratings, the borrower (or its lender) may have the right to terminate the cap agreement and receive the then current value of the cap in a lump sum, unless the cap provider “cures” the downgrade. Because a rating downgrade is a credit event, cures are essentially a shoring up of credit. The most common cures available to cap providers following a ratings downgrade are:
- Replace themselves with another provider that meets the Minimum Counterparty Ratings
- Post collateral equal to or exceeding the mark-to-market value of the cap
- Obtain a guaranty from an entity that meets the Minimum Counterparty Ratings
Most lenders allow one or more of the above remedies. Both the Minimum Counterparty Ratings and Downgrade Triggers are designed to protect cap purchasers and lenders from counterparty credit risk.
Ratings and downgrade triggers expectations
As S&P and Moody’s are historically the largest ratings agencies, they are the agencies for which cap providers are most often required to have ratings. Historically, Minimum Counterparty Ratings have ranged from as high as AA/Aa2 to as low BBB/Baa2, but the most common levels are in the single “A” range. Downgrade Triggers can also vary, but A- & A3 are the most common levels we currently see in commercial real estate loans.
Given there are many banks that are rated A- & A3 or better, one would think there should be many banks vying to provide caps with these requirements to real estate borrowers. But possessing high ratings is only one component of being a successful cap provider. In addition to having sufficient ratings, management must be confident the bank’s ratings will be maintained, and comfortable with the bank’s processes and procedures should downgrades occur.
Given the implications of counterparty ratings on both the potential availability and cost of interest rate caps, borrowers should carefully review any Minimum Counterparty Rating and Downgrade Trigger language in loan term sheets and make sure they understand the cost of compliance and how those requirements compare to the cost of other alternatives. As noted, these requirements can also vary over time and between lenders; many lenders have some flexibility on the requirements, but it is much easier to have these discussions while negotiating the overall loan terms than to address them just prior to loan closing upon realization of the significant increased cost. If a loan term sheet is silent or vague on the requirements (language such as “as reasonably acceptable to lender” is common), borrowers may want to discuss the lender expectations (if not actually documenting specific requirements) prior to finalizing a loan term sheet.
As a borrower, you likely place a high priority on avoiding material unbudgeted costs at the closing table. Understanding the impact of cap provider rating requirements and downgrade triggers is an important step to avoid an unpleasant surprise on your next floating-rate loan.
Chatham Hedging Advisors, LLC (CHA) is a subsidiary of Chatham Financial Corp. and provides hedge advisory, accounting and execution services related to swap transactions in the United States. CHA is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a commodity trading advisor and is a member of the National Futures Association (NFA); however, neither the CFTC nor the NFA have passed upon the merits of participating in any advisory services offered by CHA. For further information, please visit chathamfinancial.com/legal-notices.
Transactions in over-the-counter derivatives (or “swaps”) have significant risks, including, but not limited to, substantial risk of loss. You should consult your own business, legal, tax and accounting advisers with respect to proposed swap transaction and you should refrain from entering into any swap transaction unless you have fully understood the terms and risks of the transaction, including the extent of your potential risk of loss. This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or agent of Chatham Hedging Advisors and could be deemed a solicitation for entering into a derivatives transaction. This material is not a research report prepared by Chatham Hedging Advisors. If you are not an experienced user of the derivatives markets, capable of making independent trading decisions, then you should not rely solely on this communication in making trading decisions. All rights reserved.
Our featured insights
The intrinsic value of interest rate caps
The upfront costs of interest rate caps have increased significantly in the past six months as short-term rates have risen and expected payouts on these caps have increased in probability and amount. This piece analyzes how cap pricing in the USD interest rate market factors-in expected future...
The Bank of England base rate hits a 13-year high
On 5 May, the Bank of England (BoE) voted six to three to raise the U.K. base rate by 0.25% to 1.0%. The last time the base rate was at this level was February 2009, when monetary policy was aggressively loosened to combat the effects of the Global Financial Crisis. The market reacted to the hike...
FOMC: accelerating rate hikes
On Wednesday, May 4, the Federal Reserve Board voted unanimously to raise the Federal Funds rate by 50 basis points to 0.75 – 1.00. This is the first time since 2000 that the Federal Reserve Board has raised rates by 50 basis points. They also outlined their balance sheet runoff plan which is set...
Liability management for housing associations
This piece is the first of a short series of thought pieces on how rising interest rates may impact housing associations' approach to managing treasury risk and funding. We look at the challenges and opportunities created for the debt portfolio, with a particular emphasis on organisations that...
With pending rate hikes, interest rate caps set to pay to CRE borrowers
With the Federal Reserve set to raise rates this week, and the market pricing in additional increases in June and throughout the remainder of this year, base rates like SOFR and LIBOR are likely to rise in lockstep. If these hikes occur as predicted, many interest rate caps will begin paying out...
The hairy chart: Historical accuracy of LIBOR forward curves
These hairy chart graphs plot past LIBOR forward curves against the actual path LIBOR followed, showing that the forward curve has been a somewhat accurate predictor over the next six months or so...
Understanding recent changes in SOFR-based loan index rates
There has been a recent divergence between the different variations of SOFR used in commercial real estate (CRE) loans, with Term SOFR increasing while daily simple SOFR and New York Fed 30-Day Average SOFR remaining relatively flat prior to the Federal Reserve meeting and the other starting to...
Central bank decisions in Europe – March 2022
The Monetary Policy Committee met last week and voted eight to one on a bank rate increase by 25 bps. The messaging behind the statement however tempered the market’s expectations for the extent of future rate rises in the U.K. The European Central Bank also met the week before and their policy...