Rate cap provider ratings and downgrade triggers
Hedging and Capital Markets
Real Estate | Denver, CO
Interest rate caps are purchased to hedge floating-rate loans every business day. Cap pricing is driven by economic factors including the notional hedged, term, strike rate, forward curve, and volatility of the underlying index.
Counterparty ratings requirements
For the same reason you want a financially sound provider of life insurance - so you can be confident the provider will pay when there is a claim - lenders and borrowers also want a financially sound rate cap provider. This most often manifests itself in credit rating requirements on cap providers. When a lender sets out the requirements of a cap, they often stipulate minimum counterparty ratings requirements. Counterparty ratings requirements can be broken down into two buckets:
- Minimum counterparty ratings— are they qualified to provide the cap initially?
- The downgrade triggers— at what ratings are they no longer qualified to provide the cap?
Minimum Counterparty Ratings are the lowest credit ratings that a potential cap provider can have in order to qualify as a potential cap provider at the time of purchase, and this is pretty clear-cut—either they qualify or they don’t.
Downgrade Triggers require a cap provider to maintain certain ratings, and if they fail to maintain those ratings, the borrower (or its lender) may have the right to terminate the cap agreement and receive the then current value of the cap in a lump sum, unless the cap provider “cures” the downgrade. Because a rating downgrade is a credit event, cures are essentially a shoring up of credit. The most common cures available to cap providers following a ratings downgrade are:
- Replace themselves with another provider that meets the Minimum Counterparty Ratings
- Post collateral equal to or exceeding the mark-to-market value of the cap
- Obtain a guaranty from an entity that meets the Minimum Counterparty Ratings
Most lenders allow one or more of the above remedies. Both the Minimum Counterparty Ratings and Downgrade Triggers are designed to protect cap purchasers and lenders from counterparty credit risk.
Ratings and downgrade triggers expectations
As S&P and Moody’s are historically the largest ratings agencies, they are the agencies for which cap providers are most often required to have ratings. Historically, Minimum Counterparty Ratings have ranged from as high as AA/Aa2 to as low BBB/Baa2, but the most common levels are in the single “A” range. Downgrade Triggers can also vary, but A- & A3 are the most common levels we currently see in commercial real estate loans.
Given there are many banks that are rated A- & A3 or better, one would think there should be many banks vying to provide caps with these requirements to real estate borrowers. But possessing high ratings is only one component of being a successful cap provider. In addition to having sufficient ratings, management must be confident the bank’s ratings will be maintained, and comfortable with the bank’s processes and procedures should downgrades occur.
Given the implications of counterparty ratings on both the potential availability and cost of interest rate caps, borrowers should carefully review any Minimum Counterparty Rating and Downgrade Trigger language in loan term sheets and make sure they understand the cost of compliance and how those requirements compare to the cost of other alternatives. As noted, these requirements can also vary over time and between lenders; many lenders have some flexibility on the requirements, but it is much easier to have these discussions while negotiating the overall loan terms than to address them just prior to loan closing upon realization of the significant increased cost. If a loan term sheet is silent or vague on the requirements (language such as “as reasonably acceptable to lender” is common), borrowers may want to discuss the lender expectations (if not actually documenting specific requirements) prior to finalizing a loan term sheet.
As a borrower, you likely place a high priority on avoiding material unbudgeted costs at the closing table. Understanding the impact of cap provider rating requirements and downgrade triggers is an important step to avoid an unpleasant surprise on your next floating-rate loan.
Chatham Hedging Advisors, LLC (CHA) is a subsidiary of Chatham Financial Corp. and provides hedge advisory, accounting and execution services related to swap transactions in the United States. CHA is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a commodity trading advisor and is a member of the National Futures Association (NFA); however, neither the CFTC nor the NFA have passed upon the merits of participating in any advisory services offered by CHA. For further information, please visit chathamfinancial.com/legal-notices.
Transactions in over-the-counter derivatives (or “swaps”) have significant risks, including, but not limited to, substantial risk of loss. You should consult your own business, legal, tax and accounting advisers with respect to proposed swap transaction and you should refrain from entering into any swap transaction unless you have fully understood the terms and risks of the transaction, including the extent of your potential risk of loss. This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or agent of Chatham Hedging Advisors and could be deemed a solicitation for entering into a derivatives transaction. This material is not a research report prepared by Chatham Hedging Advisors. If you are not an experienced user of the derivatives markets, capable of making independent trading decisions, then you should not rely solely on this communication in making trading decisions. All rights reserved.
Our featured insights
What does 2021 hold for European interest rates and foreign exchange?
2021 sees the removal or reduction of major uncertainties for the market. The agreement of the Brexit trade deal and the roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines are both providing a welcome boost. Some risks remain, and new ones will emerge. What are the areas to look out for in interest rates and FX markets?
Establishing a risk policy framework
The world is full of market and political shocks. Their timing/impact on markets are difficult to predict. Implementing a risk management policy and reviewing it regularly allows you to understand your material risk exposures, and how to control those risks based on predefined policy parameters.
ISDA’s IBOR Fallbacks Supplement and Protocol for U.S. CRE investors
On Friday, October 23, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) launched the IBOR Fallbacks Supplement and Protocol, which provides a framework for transitioning interest rate derivatives from USD LIBOR to SOFR.
Is the UK moving closer to NIRP?
Negative interest rates inch closer to reality in the UK as the Bank of England checks on banks’ readiness. The following summarises why the topic is being raised again and a reminder of previous Chatham insights on the subject matter.
Interest rate swap FAQs for CRE investors
These frequently asked questions address some of the common issues that commercial real estate borrowers face when considering an interest rate swap. These include swap rates and mechanics, prepayment/breakage, documentation, and LIBOR transition.
Chatham executes first Freddie Mac SOFR interest rate cap
On Wednesday, September 9, Chatham executed the first SOFR-indexed interest rate cap on behalf of a commercial real estate (CRE) borrower in conjunction with the closing of a CBRE-originated Freddie Mac financing.
Request your interest rate cap execution checklist
Understanding the tactical steps involved in executing on an interest rate cap can help CRE investors plan and use their time efficiently prior to closing on a loan. Request your interest rate cap execution checklist here.
The Federal Reserve adopts average inflation targeting
The Fed has adopted a “flexible form of average inflation targeting” that aims for inflation rate to average 2% over time. Under this framework, the Fed funds rate will likely stay low for longer. Also, there will be an elevated emphasis on the maximum employment objective of the dual mandate.