Considering costs when evaluating interest rate swap strategies
Head of Sales
Financial Institutions | Denver, CO
Ben Lewis discusses the impact embedded costs associated with indirect swaps can have on a financial institution.
In a previous video, we discussed the two ways that community banks offer interest rate swaps to their borrowers: traditional interest rate swaps (offering swaps directly to a borrower) and indirect swaps (where a community bank introduces a correspondent bank to their borrower who then offers an interest rate swap).
Considering cost when evaluating swap strategies
There are no out-of-pocket costs associated with indirect or traditional swaps; however, the costs of indirect swaps are often opaque and embedded into the rate offered to your borrower. There are two implications to these embedded costs:
- A higher rate for the borrower potentially making the bank uncompetitive
- Could result in less fee income for the bank
Analyzing the economics of an indirect swap program
A CEO of a community bank who actively offers indirect swaps to borrowers contacted Chatham and was looking to analyze pricing. They wanted better visibility into the economics of a $6.8M transaction the bank had recently executed. After a thorough analysis, we determined that this bank would have generated $154,000 more in fee income on this single deal if they offered the swap directly to the customer. This bank could have recognized the improved economics in one of three ways (or a combination of the three):
- More fee income
- More loan spread
- Lower fixed-rate for the borrower
Banks need to consider the impact of the embedded costs associated with indirect swaps and consider offering swaps directly to their borrowers. Traditional swaps have more favorable economics, and they allow the bank to maintain complete control of the relationship with their borrowers.
We'd like to hear from you
Contact us if you are looking for an economic analysis on a recent or potential transaction involving an indirect swap.
Chatham Hedging Advisors, LLC (CHA) is a subsidiary of Chatham Financial Corp. and provides hedge advisory, accounting and execution services related to swap transactions in the United States. CHA is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a commodity trading advisor and is a member of the National Futures Association (NFA); however, neither the CFTC nor the NFA have passed upon the merits of participating in any advisory services offered by CHA. For further information, please visit chathamfinancial.com/legal-notices.
Transactions in over-the-counter derivatives (or “swaps”) have significant risks, including, but not limited to, substantial risk of loss. You should consult your own business, legal, tax and accounting advisers with respect to proposed swap transaction and you should refrain from entering into any swap transaction unless you have fully understood the terms and risks of the transaction, including the extent of your potential risk of loss. This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or agent of Chatham Hedging Advisors and could be deemed a solicitation for entering into a derivatives transaction. This material is not a research report prepared by Chatham Hedging Advisors. If you are not an experienced user of the derivatives markets, capable of making independent trading decisions, then you should not rely solely on this communication in making trading decisions. All rights reserved.21-0115
Our featured insights
Back-to-Back Swap Program Benchmark Statistics Report
Our back-to-back swap benchmark report compares customer swap transactions across years, regions, and bank asset size. While your financial institution may not yet be using swaps to win more commercial loan business, you can still find value in reviewing this report.
Q4 GDP slows, funding pressures intensify
After falling for much of January, Treasury yields rebounded modestly last week as investors digested weak economic data and a slew of corporate earnings reports and awaited the early February FOMC monetary policy meeting.
Weak retail sales report sours sentiment and sends yields lower
In a holiday-shortened week, Treasury yields notched their third-consecutive week of declines as investors digested weaker-than-expected economic data coupled with the Bank of Japan’s continued commitment to yield curve control.
Cool CPI report drives rates lower
In the first full trading week of the year, Treasuries and the major U.S. equity indices advanced as market participants welcomed signs of easing price pressures and a less aggressive Federal Reserve.
Rates drop on “Goldilocks” NFP
Treasury yields dropped substantially to start the new year, most notably at the long end, as investors digested a slew of manufacturing and employment data and recalibrated Fed policy rate expectations.
Market Update: Strategies for Volatile Markets
Join Chatham for our next market update webinar where our team will discuss the current market and highlight strategies that are being executed by our balance sheet risk management clients. We will share perspective on the interest rate risk concerns of financial institutions as we head into 2023...
Engage with Chatham at AOBA 2023
Banks have ways to manage interest rate volatility, but many institutions often lack a powerful and flexible tool: derivatives. Attend our breakout session to hear how bankers have overcome areas of resistance to add this tool to protect earnings and capital.
ABA Banking Journal asked Matthew Tevis and Todd Cuppia to explain why community banks are returning to wholesale funding
ABA Banking Journal reports community banks will return to wholesale funding as deposits return to normal levels after historic highs during the pandemic. Matthew Tevis and Todd Cuppia explain how these banks are hedging those moves to limit volatility in their liabilities.